Friday, September 29, 2017
Things that make you go hmmmm.... T207 Edition
When it comes to old tobacco cards, I don't think it's unfair to say that George Gibson is well represented. He's got a T3, a T201, 6 T202s, a T205, T206 (more than one if you count the backs), T216s and even some stamps (T330-2 and T332).
But one set whose checklist does not contain Gibby is the 1912 T207 Brown Backgrounds. And while you might expect that he'd be in the set because he's in the T205 and T206 set, to expect that is to not fully understand the T207 set. Which isn't to say that anyone really understands the T207 checklist.
The T207 Brown Backgrounds are interesting. After the colourful T205 and T206 issues, the T207 set might be considered bland, by some. They are, well, very brown. This isn't to say they aren't popular, they're nowhere near as popular as T206s to be sure, but there are some die-hard T207 collectors out there. While some argue that the colour palette a little bland, others believe that it's part of the set's charm.
At 200 cards, the T207 set is about the size of the T205 set, but less than half of the size of the T206 set. For some, the checklist lacks the appeal of other sets of the era. The T207 issue is a chance to build an early set without having to buy a Honus Wagner, an Eddie Plank, or 4 Ty Cobb cards. In fact, this set is missing many of the major stars of era. Walter Johnson is probably the key to the set. Tinker and Chance are here, but Evers is missing. So is Mordecai Brown. McGraw and Bresnahan are present, Mathewson is absent. Tris Speaker and Eddie Cicotte got cards, Jake Stahl got left out. The list goes on.
The Pirates representation is particularly interesting.
Based on numbers from baseball-reference.com, here are the Pittsburgh players that played the most at each non-pitching position in 1911:
C 100 George Gibson
1B 104 Bill McKechnie
2B 137 Dots Miller
SS 130 Honus Wagner
3B 153 Bobby Byrne
OF 129 Max Carey
OF 110 Fred Clarke
OF 148 Chief Wilson
And for 1912:
C 95 George Gibson
1B 148 Dots Miller
2B 111 Alex McCarthy
SS 145 Honus Wagner
3B 130 Bobby Byrne
OF 77 Mike Donlin
OF 152 Chief Wilson
OF 150 Max Carey
Here are the position players represented in the T207 set
Bobby Byrne
Max Carey
Mike Donlin
Ham Hyatt
Billy Kelly
Alex McCarthy
Bill McKechnie
Dots Miller
Tommy Leach
Mike Simon
Chief Wilson
Between 1911 and 1912, the most active players, by position, not included in this set are:
George Gibson
Honus Wagner
Fred Clarke
Wagner missing is probably expected. For whatever reason you believe he was pulled from the T206 set, he was likely also left out of T205, and, had bigger stars been included, would have likely been passed over in T207. Clarke is in both T205 and T206, but didn't actually play any games in 1912 as his career was winding down. I suppose it's possible that American Tobacco knew he wouldn't play (ie. I don't know if anything was announced to that effect), so maybe his absence makes sense.
But what about Gibson? He is in the T205 set. He is in the T206 set. In 1912, he is at the height of his stardom, and, in 1911 he caught more Pirates games than backup catchers Mike Simon and Billy Kelly combined. Combined!
And in case you didn't scroll back up to check, both Kelly and Simon are in this set.
Here are their cards:
Now the fun part -- and the reason for this whole post. I got a text from my buddy Marty yesterday telling me to check out the back of Simon's T207 card.
Check this out:
The back of Simon's card labels him as "George Gibson's efficient understudy". The bio mentions Gibson twice more. Is this the back of a Simon card, or the back of a Gibson card?
Once Marty put this idea in my head, I went and checked out the back of Bill Kelly's T207.
It's not quite as Gibson-oriented, but his name gets dropped here too. Look at this:
"Before the season of 1912 was two months' old Kelly had supplanted the veteran Gibson as leading receiver for the Pirates."
I've not checked the numbers to see if this is true, but if you look at the numbers for the entire season, nobody supplanted Gibson. He appeared in 95 games, compared to 48 by Billy Kelly, 42 by Mike Simon and 1 by Earl Blackburn. Just like in 1911, Gibson caught more Pirates games than all of Pittsburgh's other catchers combined.
The American Tobacco Company, and more specifically, those that put together the T207 set in 1912, are obviously aware that Gibson is the catcher in Pittsburgh, why didn't they include him in the set?
And secondly, how do I not add these cards to my collection?
Thanks for the post idea, Marty!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I am so lost! This post should have been titled "TMI" :)
ReplyDeleteMaybe I should change the title to "Things that make Jon go Zzzzzzz" ;)
DeleteGreat work on this back analysis! Know if there's a chance Gibson held off appearing the set by choice or didn't like to sit for studio photos? If the company couldn't get an affordable photo of George or couldn't reach him for clearance to include him, is it possible they'd written up a card back and just never got the photo they needed for the front? I could see him also opting out to support Wagner's decision not to be in some tobacco sets, though it's not clear how well-known Honus made that to his teammates, since most do appear.
ReplyDeleteHey Matthew. Truth is, I have no answers. The T207 checklist as a whole is odd. Gibson appears in many of the ATC-issued tobacco sets of the era, but not T207. There are other Pirates in the issue, so the notion that Gibson didn't agree to be included (for any reason) is about as credible as any suggestion I've heard.
Delete